Subscriber Updates

August 9, 2010 on 9:44 am | In Miscellaneous, Honors, Subscriber Updates, Site news | No Comments

If you have a subscription to either the Regular or the Honors Worksheets, you will notice that links have been added for answer sheets. These are a new feature and an addition to the package that I trust will enhance the worksheets. It will take time for all of the answer sheets to appear, however they will be added on a regular basis.

Newsletter #2

July 25, 2010 on 9:42 am | In Miscellaneous | No Comments

Newsletter #2 can now be read, here.

Want to be added to the mailing list? Click here.

AP Scores 2010 - Best EVER!

July 8, 2010 on 10:21 pm | In Miscellaneous, AP | 2 Comments

The AP scores for my chemistry classes have now been received and the average score is the best that my students have ever recorded. A total of 34 students scored 31 “5’s” and 3 “4’s” for an average of 4.91.

Nice work and congratulations to all.

Subscriber Updates

June 30, 2010 on 7:51 pm | In Miscellaneous, AP, Subscriber Updates, Site news | No Comments

All relevant subscribers have had the 2010 AP Worked Answers added to their subscriber areas.

Newsletter #1

June 29, 2010 on 10:37 am | In Miscellaneous, Site news, Newsletters | No Comments

Newsletter #1 can now be read, here.

Want to be added to the mailing list? Click here.

Subscription discounts through August 1st, 2010

June 29, 2010 on 7:40 am | In Miscellaneous, Site news | No Comments

I’m offering a 15% discount on all subscriptions purchased through August 1, 2010.

Details here; Subscriber pages

Simply purchase as normal, and within 48 hours receive a 15% PayPal refund.

Subscriber Updates

June 19, 2010 on 9:10 am | In Miscellaneous, AP, Organic, Subscriber Updates, AP TOPIC 11 | No Comments

Organic materials in TOPICS 1-5 have been updated in the relevant subscriber areas.

My new book finally sees the light of day

June 18, 2010 on 6:41 am | In Miscellaneous, How to Make A Universe With 92 Ingredients | No Comments

After several delays it appears as though my new book will be available for purchaseĀ in October 2010. The preview of, “How To MakeĀ A Universe With 92 Ingredients”, is now on Amazon.com;

http://www.amazon.com/How-Make-Universe-92-Ingredien/dp/1407117912/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1276861195&sr=8-1

2010 Exam Comments and DRAFT Answers

May 13, 2010 on 3:22 pm | In Miscellaneous, AP | 6 Comments

Below you will find my comments on the 2010 AP chemistry exam, and my DRAFT answers. PLEASE NOTE: The answers are my first draft and I will be very happy to receive comments and corrections. Thanks go out to an AP reader for taking a look and making suggestions - you know who you are.

Comments:

Question 1:
Standard fare. Lacks much imagination, I’m afraid.

Question 2:
Very, very easy.

Question 3:
Very, very easy.

Although it makes no difference to the question, the production of Mn3+ in the half-reaction where manganate(VII) is an oxidizing agent, seems a little esoteric and unnecessary to me. Now, perhaps under some circumstances it DOES do that, but in every reference I have ever seens at this level I have only ever witnessed it turning into Mn2+. In addition, Greenwood & Earnshaw, Chemistry of the Elements (known as the “green brick” and my go to guide on such matters) suggests that Mn2+ is the usual product. (G&E DOES mention that one “preparative route” to Mn3+ is “reduction of KMnO4″, but it also notes that Mn3+ has a “marked tendency to disproportionate”. My gripe here is NOT really about the chemistry (whatever it may be), but rather about the wisdom of suddenly having Mn3+ turn up as a product of the acid reduction of Mn7+ instead of (infinitely more usual) Mn2+. It seems like an unncessary diversion and something that could confuse potentially excellent candidates. It just doesn’t make much sense to me.

Question 4:
It seems as though the question writers have given up on this part of the exam. Possibly the easiest EVER? Why GIVE the colors in (a)(ii)? Why tell the kids a gas is produced in (c)(i)? The astonishing decline of complexity in this question in recent years is mildly depressing.

Question 5:
Very, very standard/easy.

(c) Delighted than ethanoic acid seems to finally be supplanting “acetic acid”! Hooray!

Question 6:
Very, very standard/easy.

If this represents a comprehensive and vigorous examination of the best, and highest level of chemistry being taught in American high schools then I think that we have a problem. I remain a HUGE supporter of the public examination/standardized test and its place, but this test simply does not add up to much of challenge at all. Quite weak and disappointing.

ANSWERS

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^